The Web of History

Because Truth has a liberal bias

  • Liberalism Defined

    "But if by a 'Liberal' they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people -- their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties -- someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a 'Liberal,' then I'm proud to say I'm a 'Liberal.'" John F. Kennedy New York Acceptance Speech
  • Conservativism Defined

    People who call themselves conservatives, support the status quo. They believe the systems in place, such as capitalism and "business as usual" are all well and fine, but that any existing social programs are a waste of money and promote laziness and waste.

    Many conservatives believe that Leave it to Beaver and Father Knows Best were documentaries.
  • Socialism in the US

    "The roots of socialism in America can be traced to the arrival of German immigrants in the 1850s when Marxian socialist unions began, such as the National Typographic Union in 1852, United Hatters of 1856, and Iron Moulders' Union of North America in 1859." US History.com

    1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

    2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
    b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

    3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by equal distribution of goods and pay.

Archive for February, 2011

Shut it Down! – Excuses I’ve heard

Posted by webofhistory on February 6, 2011

Shut it down!

Those of us who live in the “First World” countries, aka “Developed Countries,” can have a strong and far-reaching impact if we would participate in a world-wide General Strike or Hatal in support of Democracy for Egypt.

Refuse to work, refuse to spend, refuse to cooperate with the “First World” governments who would assume to control the Egyptian government and who would appropriate the Pro-Democracy demonstrations and message in order to increase “First World” power and their strangle-hold on the Middle East.

Shut it down!

Here are some of the excuses I’ve heard as to why someone can’t, won’t, or refuses to support/participate in a General Strike or Hatal on behalf of Democracy for the Egyptian people against a 30 year dictatorship.

I don’t believe in the cause. Authoritarianism+Paternalism=Ignorance

This person believes the simple minded message being catapulted in the media about security versus chaos. This type of person can look no further than the “common knowledge” of “accepted wisdom.” They will question nothing and accept the message as given.  They can’t, or won’t, trouble their “beautiful mind” with the knowledge that people in Egypt are arrested and tortured for blogging. They can’t, or won’t, trouble their “beautiful mind” with the knowledge that the current ruling regime in Egypt runs an apparatus that would be the envy of the Kremlin in its “glory” days. They can’t be bothered to think of the Egyptian people as…people. They view them as ignorant and violent and bloodthirsty children to be ruled over and controlled by “our” more knowledgeable and sophisticated Western governments because, “We” know what’s good for them. They are filled with authoritarian and paternalistic filth that oozes from their “beautiful minds.”

It won’t work. The self-fulfilling-prophecy excuse.

A General Strike/Hatal won’t work so they won’t participate. They don’t participate, the numbers are reduced, and it doesn’t work. They sabotage a movement because they refuse to try then point and those others who refuse to try as to why it won’t work. See? They were right.

The multinationals have too much money; it won’t hurt them.

Besides, they say, it won’t really hurt xyz multinational corp; their profits are huge! There are millions of “Us” who do business with them. It’s not about destroying them with one fell-blow, it’s about smacking them upside the head to get their attention. There are millions of “Us.” See, for example, what a world of hurt the housing crisis put them in. They all started screaming then, didn’t they. It can be done. We can get their attention. This time, the “First World” governments can’t afford to bail out their sorry asses.

I can’t afford to lose my job!

Ah, this is the person watching what is happening to the Pro-Democracy protesters as the state-run thugs throw petrol bombs and bricks at the unarmed protesters. This is the person who will watch a police van mow down the protesters or snipers pick them off and wish, just Wish and Hope and Pray for their safety. But can’t be bothered to risk their job much less their life in the name of Democracy.

They will Pray. Give them an address and they will donate money. They will “go to the streets” in their safe country, far away from the atrocities happening in Egypt, and they will chant slogans and support. But don’t ask them to risk their job, a late fee on a bill, or their credit rating. The new “yuppie, Nuremberg defense;” I can’t lose my job! While watching “others” die.

Prejudice+”religion”+ignorance=Fear
OMG!!!! Muslims! Islamists! and Terrorists! OH, MY!

The common refrain of the “First World” governments whose long, bloody history is rife with tales of conquest under the banner of “christianity”. Using “religion” and “God’s Will” and “Manifest Destiny” to justify the destruction of indigenous peoples as they moved into one country after another exploiting resources and enslaving people to gain power, wealth and control. Then discarding them and their countries while claiming the enslaved are incapable of self rule, are less than human, are heathens and barbarians.

These are the fearful, the violent, the weak…the collaborators.

Again I say;

Shut it down!

Those of us who live in the “First World” countries, aka “Developed Countries,” can have a strong and far-reaching impact if we would participate in a world-wide General Strike or Hatal in support of Democracy for Egypt.

Refuse to work, refuse to spend, refuse to cooperate with the “First World” governments who would assume to control the Egyptian government and who would appropriate the Pro-Democracy demonstrations and message in order to increase “First World” power and their strangle-hold on the Middle East.

Shut it down!

 

Posted in Egyptian Democracy, Politics | Leave a Comment »

General Strike in support of Egyptian Democracy

Posted by webofhistory on February 5, 2011

Show solidarity with Pro-Democracy Egyptians protesting throughout Egypt.

General Strike.  Hatal.

Go viral. Go Global.

general strike is a strike action by a critical mass of the labour force in a city, region, or country. While a general strike can be for political goals, economic goals, or both, it tends to gain its momentum from the ideological or class sympathies of the participants. It is also characterized by participation of workers in a multitude of workplaces, and tends to involve entire communities. The general strike has waxed and waned in popularity since the mid-19th century, and has characterized many historically important strikes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_strike

Hartal (also hartaal) (Bengali: হরতাল; Hindi: हड़ताल; Urdu: ہڑتال) is a term in many Indian languages for strike action, used often during theIndian Independence Movement. It is mass protest often involving a total shutdown of workplaces, offices, shops, courts of law as a form ofcivil disobedience. In addition to being a general strike, it involves the voluntary closing of schools and places of business. It is a mode of appealing to the sympathies of a government to change an unpopular or unacceptable decision.[1]

Hartal was originally a Gujarati expression signifying the closing down of shops and warehouses with the object of realising a demand. MK Gandhi (sometimes referred to by his supporters as Father of the Nation), who hailed from Gujarat, organised a series of anti-British general strikes which he called hartals, thereby institutionalizing it. This form of public protest dates back to days of British colonial rule in India. Repressive actions infringing on human rights by the colonial British Government and princely states against countrywide peaceful movementfor ending British rule in India often triggered such localised public protest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartal

Posted in Egyptian Democracy | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.